Provenance

Zero Trust Execution Control

Prove That Execution Happened — Or Ensure It Never Does

Provenance intercepts at the point of execution, binding identity, device, and command context into a single trust decision. Actions that can’t be verified are denied before they run. Actions that pass produce cryptographically signed envelopes — making every permitted operation provable, replayable, and defensible.

The Execution Problem

A Single Compromised Credential Shut Down 5,500 Miles of Pipeline

Colonial Pipeline didn’t fail because of a missing firewall or an unpatched server. It failed because a single stolen password gave an attacker unrestricted execution access — and nothing in the environment could distinguish a legitimate session from a hostile one. The attacker moved laterally, exfiltrated 100 GB of data, and deployed ransomware. The pipeline shut down for six days. Fuel shortages hit 17 states. The President declared a state of emergency.

This isn’t a one-off. It’s the default outcome when systems monitor execution after the fact instead of controlling it at the point of action.

Credentials Stolen, reused, or shared passwords remain the #1 initial access vector. MFA alone doesn’t bind identity to device or intent.
Lateral Movement Once inside, attackers traverse freely. Network segmentation slows them down. It doesn’t stop execution.
Blind Spots OT and distributed infrastructure extend the attack surface beyond conventional perimeters — millions of endpoints with limited visibility and no execution control.
Detection Lag SIEM sees the event after it happens. By the time an alert fires, the action has already executed.
Incident Response Without execution-level proof of what occurred, response teams reconstruct timelines from fragmented logs and guesswork.

Monitoring tells you what happened. Provenance decides what’s allowed to happen — and produces signed proof of every decision.

The Execution Boundary

No Execution Without a Verdict. No Verdict Without Proof.

The industry secured the perimeter, then the session, then the identity. But the action itself — the command that runs on the system — still executes on trust. Provenance stands between intent and execution, evaluates identity, device, and command context as a single decision, and produces a cryptographically signed record of every verdict.

Provenance decision boundary — identity, device, and command context evaluated at the execution boundary, producing signed proof or blocking access, with continuous signed execution records
How It Works

Runtime Enforcement at the Point of Execution

Every action is intercepted, evaluated against policy with full identity and device context, and cryptographically signed — whether allowed or denied.

PROVENANCE — ZERO TRUST EXECUTION CONTROL ALLOW DENY IDENTITY Operator Entra / AD / PAM JWT: roles, groups oid / sub / tenant device + network zone Requested Action: POST /actions/set-pressure { value: 85 } JWT + Req ENFORCEMENT POINT Provenance Daemon Build Decision Context ① Extract user claims ② Collect device/session ctx ③ Resolve action + params ④ Evaluate Policy allow set_pressure if role ∈ [ot.operator] AND zone == “ot-control” ⑤ Sign Decision Envelope EXECUTE Execution Target PLC / Control Plane API / Service Shell / Pipeline ✓ Command executed set-pressure → 85 Signed Envelope decision: ALLOW sig + cert_chain + proof TRUST SYSTEM Verifier + PKI ✓ Validate cert chain ✓ Verify signature ✓ Check transparency proof ✅ VERIFIED DECISION workload cert bootstrap (mTLS) ⚠ Attacker Stolen credential Wrong role / group Untrusted device Wrong network zone SSH / script / direct API Policy Evaluation: DENY ✗ role not in [ot.operator] ✗ zone ≠ “ot-control” ✗ device_trust = unknown EXECUTION BLOCKED Never reached Signed Envelope decision: DENY sig + cert_chain + reason SecOps / Audit Verified denial artifact Replayable · Non-repudiable KEY DIFFERENCE Both ALLOW and DENY produce cryptographic, machine-verifiable decision artifacts. Identity (IdP) Daemon (PEP) Allow → Execute Deny → Block Trust System Signed Envelope Runtime Enforcement
Execution Integrity

Every Envelope Is an Asset

Provenance doesn’t just enforce decisions — it produces a cryptographic record of every one. Allow or deny, every verdict becomes a signed, verifiable artifact that serves every consumer downstream — from the SOC to the auditor to the courtroom.

Replayable System History

Every action has a signed, sequenced record. No reconstructing timelines from fragmented logs. Replay exactly what happened, when, by whom, on what device — or prove that it never executed.

Forensic Defensibility

Signed envelopes are tamper-evident and independently verifiable. Certificate chains, transparency proofs, and cryptographic signatures that hold up under legal scrutiny, regulatory review, and third-party audit.

Continuous Compliance Evidence

Every envelope maps to control requirements. ProofLayer consumes them directly — turning execution history into structured compliance evidence without manual collection or reconciliation.

Operational Visibility

Real-time execution telemetry across every endpoint. See what’s executing, where, and whether it was authorized — not after an alert fires, but at the moment of decision.

One decision. One envelope. From the SOC to the assessor — every consumer gets canonical, signed proof of what happened and what didn’t.

Get Started

Ready to Control Execution at the Boundary?

Schedule a technical conversation with our team. We’ll walk through your current execution environment, identify where trust is assumed instead of verified, and show you how Provenance closes the gap with signed, defensible proof.

Scroll to Top